🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage may be the optimal choice for a bold scary movie focused on Jesus Christ, but not for the motivations some fans might assume. In reality, the star doesn't even act as the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: his role is credited merely as The Carpenter. Cage is positioned as the Joseph within this tale, working to uphold his faith as The Boy (played by Noah Jupe), his now-teenage adopted son, begins to display miraculous gifts. The explanation it’s difficult to imagine any other prominent performer taking this character is that although the figure is burdened with multiple trials, the actor appears practically touchingly certain that this murky, somber feature is worth his time.

Cage's Latest Film Selections

Nicolas Cage has been allocating those years more carefully in recent years. He yet makes additional projects than the majority of casual fans may ever watch — for example, were you informed that he has made several separate frontier films recently? — but he also adds esteemed independent films for example one recent hit, another notable movie, and a further title. The Carpenter’s Son appears to be a similar project, because it’s borderline horror, potentially provocative, and approaches a campy-sounding premise quite seriously.

Movie's Storyline and Direction

Sadly, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not justify that serious attention. The Carpenter’s Son opens in a engagingly rootless setting, marketed as inspired by an obscure religious text concerning the early years of Jesus. Cage's character, the maternal figure, and their son relocate from place to place, afraid of faith-based hostility or doubt over their son's unusual abilities. “Calamity follows us,” Cage sadly observes. This persists when dark forces focus on them at their new home, initiating on that traditional religious challenge for the son.

At times, this production echoes an demonic possession-type horror film, except that no one of the central roles are directly possessed. Instead, they become progressively isolated from one another, as these powers affect a local young woman (Isla Johnston, credited as an outsider) who the son forms a relationship with, and presents everyone troubling visions of a bleak destiny. The Carpenter in particular grapples with his role in this story, occasionally berating the son who mystifies him.

Discussion and Sensitivity

This material is apt to court controversy, and Nathan handles it with much care — excessive, perhaps. The concept of a adolescent confronted with his destined offering and seduced by unknown powers is indeed terrifying, but the filmmaker may be wary of seeming gratuitous and anxious to indicate his intentions, so he often withdraws to dimly foreboding visuals. The roles constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who demonstrated real promise in the 2024 Crow remake, interestingly — yields her role to her character's costume, occasionally interrupted by a few gnarly horror imagery.

Cage's Portrayal and Movie's Weaknesses

Meanwhile, Cage dabbles in precisely the type of melodramatic acting that his more snickering appreciators could be expecting. There is a moment (shown) in promotional material where Cage loses control and screams “I’ve lost my faith!” If that kind of dramatic explosion is included in your Jesus-themed horror movie, maybe a more brazenly silly method would make better use of his eagerness to exaggerate as required. Instead, the film echoes the poorer direct-to-video films Cage made during that period — apart from the B-movies instead the dramas and ghost stories that typically appear interesting, and usually have some select Cage moments, but in the end seem like, indeed, inexpensive direct-to-consumer content.

Truthfully, some of those, while less ambitious, were easier to view in general. This is when I need to disregard my own dogma, not religious but career-related: Years back, a beloved editor convinced me to eliminate adjectives like “boring” or “dull” from my film-criticism vocabulary. These phrases express scant except a individual and generically described impatience, withdrawing from the task of vividly conveying the thoughtful and emotional experience of watching a particular movie. It's challenging to express boredom without appearing dull personally. It's just as unclear as labeling a movie “interesting.” “Elaborate,” that is.

However, I admit, I felt uninterested during much of The Carpenter’s Son. In its defense, it is a devotional type of stultification, not due to this movie is lecturing, but as it requires a type of dutiful submission to watch it. After a while soon after starting, the movie locks into a cyclic tempo of simmering anguish, and does not