🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, actor Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized image promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it functions as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Kremlin and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a tailor-made persona of Putin. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last fall, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from disorder. While the character's name Mikhail, the implication is clear: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this identical story rather than undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book sets out to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is presented as having been chosen by influential figures to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with many candidates. Central to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the country in practice.

• His list included various figures, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to an expert who studied his rise, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process said the key criterion was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the move to framing him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and social media to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to portray this choice as a small victory. The film's exclusion of mass protests, the political rivals, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.